![]() The second property is a building on a 28 x15 metres site in RMV II Stage. The first is a building on a 40 x 36 ft building in Hanumanthanagar which had two houses and three shops. THE BOOTY OVER WHICH THEY FOUGHT In Soundarya's will that was the bone of contention, mention was made of six properties. Nirmala also filed a case against Manjula and Raghu, alleging domestic violence and seeking share in the property as per the will. The family dispute over property started in 2009, with Sathvik, a minor represented by his mother, Nirmala, filing a case against his grandmother and uncle for alienating property that was his according to the will. The will divides her five immovable properties in Bangalore and Hyderabad and movable properties including cash, fixed deposits, shares and jewellery to the four people. Soundarya is said to have made the will on February 15, 2003, a year before her death and two months before her marriage. Soundarya and Amarnath are survived by their mother, KS Manjula, Soundarya’s husband, Raghu GS, Amarnath’s wife, B Nirmala, and their son, Sathvik. The family members have now arrived at a compromise and the last of the complaints against each other were withdrawn a few days ago. Cases were filed in courts, and at the centre of this dispute was a will, which two members claimed was real while two others alleged was a fake. Last year, the four surviving members of the her family started fighting over the properties left behind by the actress. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |